If people are serious about breast cancer, they have to deal with secondhand smoke. That’s what this is all about.

It doesn’t take much to cause big effects. If you already have compromised coronary circulation and go into a smoky environment, there is a substantial increase in your risk of an acute event.

would cut movie smoking’s effect on kids in half, saving 50,000 lives a year in the U.S. alone.

What Phillip Morris is doing here is a tremendous disservice to parents and to infants because it’s increasing the risk infants will die.

I think this is the beginning of the unraveling of several indictments,

Secondhand smoke is even worse than we thought. It increases the risk for an acute coronary event like a heart attack or long-term development of atherosclerosis.

This report is forcing reconsideration of this issue by health officials all over the world.

It is biased too heavily toward the private sector.

There are more studies, the risk estimates are more consistently elevated, and they’re higher than they were for lung cancer. Plus, there’s all these toxicology studies and molecular biology they didn’t have back then.

It’s pretty simple. These laws are very bad for the cigarette companies, because they create an environment for people to quit if they want to.

There are plenty of people in California government who are running agencies that are larger and more complex than the University of California who are not getting ridiculously astronomical salaries.

This is a seminal, international document. It’s impossible to underestimate what a big deal this is.

entirely free to publish his review without including our comments and without restriction.