The underlying allegations are really just the same, but relabeled. The government has been investigating my client since 2002. You would think that by this time they would be able to prove that he actually...

The government has shown no evidence that he actually attended; the government has failed to prove its case. Ladies and gentlemen, you can’t prove what never happened.

We didn’t think the government would have enough evidence. I don’t think any of it is damaging.

There is clearly jury misconduct. My client should be entitled to a new trial.

There are issues with the jury being influenced outside of the court. An innocent man has been found guilty.

This is an extraordinarily high amount. We feel good about it because they’re not a danger to the community. The judge told us if we came up with more property, he would consider that a...

The government’s conduct coupled with the widespread national media attention this case has received confirms that the defendants could not have a fair trial with an impartial jury anywhere in the United States.

His work experience at the time involved fast-food and convenience stores. He didn’t have a college degree or U.S. citizenship. He had a burglary conviction. He had no real future.

He’s saying that she couldn’t see the evidence, couldn’t see he was guilty.

There is so much more than second thoughts in that affidavit.

He said what he said because he thought he was telling the government what they wanted to hear.

He was coerced into saying what he said. He thought he was cooperating and truly didn’t know what he was getting himself into.

I don’t really think we necessarily need much more.

You would think the government would be able to produce direct evidence that my client attended a training camp. They cannot because that evidence does not exist.

It was a little bit of an intimidating situation. Essentially, I walked into a small conference room with about 10 Muslim religious leaders, all men, whom I had not met before.

I don’t think all the jurors agreed.