I’d call it a design omission.

The reason it immediately shows up on my radar screen as being horribly low is because the soils are so variable.

The problem is not technological, it’s organizational.

The water level in the canals wasn’t that high when the floodwalls breached. We had a premature failure of the defense system.

Now they want to build the levees a little higher and add some rocks on top of the canal. It’s still a patchwork-quilt approach, which has already failed miserably.

As that concrete is breaking, it will emit sounds that probably to them sounded very much like muffled gunshots. Then they would have these very large booming sounds as that barge was slamming against the...

It didn’t hold. There isn’t a door, and they’ve got measly sandbags they’re putting in to compensate.

We would rather invest a little money now than pay 10 to 100 times that amount in the future.

We can see lots of evidence why those people could have heard very loud sounds that could have sounded like explosions.

The thinking was, those levees are just protecting farmland. But time goes on. We continue to develop, but we are dragging this 1.3 with us. We upgrade the levee system after (Hurricane) Betsy with better...

It was like uncorking a bottle.

This margin of safety was incredibly low.

The center of New Orleans is certainly not protection of farmland, so the factor of safety was incredibly low. We’re talking about thousands of families without homes and shutting down a commercial infrastructure that’s pretty...

We’re still viewing it as cows eating grass, and it isn’t.

It’s like the snooze alarm on the alarm clock. You can only turn it off so many times before you get in trouble.

There is some urgency to it.

The whole rebuilding of this infrastructure is, I think, a critical issue for us to come to grips with.