We support Syria without any doubt. Syria is our friend.

What the president said is an academic issue. The West’s reaction shows their continued support for Zionists.

We are ready for negotiations, but it is up to the Europeans how logically they respond. It would benefit the Europeans to be logical about this matter.

If it means enrichment be carried out (only) in Russia, we have said it is not acceptable. But if it is a complementary plan, we will study it.

Dialogue is the only solution. Europeans should not act in haste. They should note that agreement comes out of talks.

We will accept positively the propositions and the plans that recognize the right of the Islamic republic to carry out enrichment on its own soil.

They (Kuwaitis) will naturally not be allowed to do anything in Iran’s territorial waters, but if they do anything, it should be where it is not claimed by Iran.

Considering arrest and abduction of certain Iranian pilgrims Iranians are needed to visit the country through legal channels.

This resolution is political. It comes from American pressure. … It lacks any legal or logical basis and is unacceptable.

The 5+1 meeting in Moscow is more important for the participating countries than for us, because if they do not act wisely and make a mistake, they are the ones who will suffer losses. The...

The agency and other parties should not block roads to … Iran.

Whatever the result of this meeting might be, Iran will not abandon its rights (to nuclear technology).

We advise them (Europe) not to choose any path except dialogue. If there is a retribution to be paid, that will include Europe too.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has full control over its long, joint borders with Afghanistan. The recent U.S. accusations against Iran are inspired and dictated by the Zionist regime.

The only way to reach an understanding and to get out of the current situation is talks.

The Russian proposal is not on the agenda any more. Circumstances have changed. We must wait and see how the situation will develop [in the UN Security Council].

There is no judicial or legal reason to send the Iranian dossier to the Security Council.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has adopted measures to fight such moves in line with efforts to defend national security and within the framework of bilateral accords already reached with Iraq.

Nuclear research will go on, and threats and blackmail will have no effect on the regime’s decision.

It would be good for Mr Blair to participate in the Holocaust seminar in Tehran.

Let the negotiations with different sides continue. Later we can make judgments.

However, that does not mean that we will rule out the European trio. We just want to talk with all countries and our principal negotiating partner is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Instead of being misleading, the Danish prime minister should present an apology and put an end to this affair, and promise it will never happen again.

Unlike the British, Iran does not make accusations without sufficient evidence to support them.

Tomorrow will be crucial for the IAEA, for a big test is confronting the agency, by which it will show how it defends its own authority and credibility by securing its members’ rights. We hope...

Meanwhile, we are looking forward to the reaction of other states to the grave mistake made in the IAEA.

The Russian proposal is ambiguous. If they want to propose enrichment (only) in Russia we have said it is not acceptable. But if it is a complementary or parallel plan, we will study that.

While the activities of the Islamic Republic have always been peaceful and carried out under the supervision of the IAEA, the approval of this resolution puts the efficiency and independence of the agency under serious...

The support given by the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Palestinian people and their cause is merely spiritual. Not only Iran but all Muslim and freedom-loving states supported the legitimate struggles of the Palestinian...

They [Kuwaitis] will naturally not be allowed to do anything in Iran’s territorial waters, but if they do anything, it should be where it is not claimed by Iran.

It is aimed at violating the religious values, causing discord and sectarian wars as well as damaging national unity in Iraq.

We have information that the United States is interfering in the northwest of Iran. That is unacceptable and we are going to protest,

I recommend that they do not make hasty decisions, be prudent and study their path in the past. Any time they have pressured Iran they have got adverse results.

These remarks are made to justify failures in Iraq, since Americans and world opinions are pinpointing (that US) weaknesses are on the rise,

We will stand by our right to nuclear technology. It is our red line. We are ready to deal with any possible scenario. Iran is not afraid of threatening language.

We will defend our rights. Iran believes that we can come to a solution through talks, and there is no legal basis for referring Iran’s dossier to the Security Council. We are not afraid at...

Insulting the prophet was unacceptable, resentful, and a sign of barbarism.

Iran is determined to remove ambiguities, continue talks and win its rights.

Dissemination of such reports aim to cover up failure of the occupying forces in guaranteeing security of Iraq.

Britain, instead of repeating awkward accusations, had better think of a plan to withdraw its troops from Iraq.

Iran will not allow any cross-border operation of any terrorist group against Iranian or Iraqi interests consistent with their commitment to the international campaign against terrorism.