Conditions have changed, we are facing a new situation.

Iran has no problem with resuming talks. But it will not accept conditional talks under pressure.

We will only review those proposals which include mastering the nuclear fuel cycle inside Iran.

We welcome the trial of Saddam, but the invasion of Iran should be included in the charges,

The source of contamination was not related to Iran. We are sure the source is not internal.

The referral of nuclear file to the Security Council is not scary at all for Iran, and it does not have any legal basis.

The Zionists and their allies played unskillfully this time, making it clear that their allegations against Iran’s nuclear programs emanate from Iran’s objection to Israel’s systematic killing of defenseless Palestinians.

If the Russian proposal makes itself compatible with the new conditions, it can be negotiated.

Gone is the time when they could deny Iran its rights by threatening it, … legitimate right to have peaceful nuclear technology.

Our red line is our nuclear rights.

Europe’s behavior will heavily influence the decision.

Indefinite suspension of nuclear enrichment activities is not acceptable to the Islamic Republic of Iran … and it is not a subject of the talks.

Europeans should be patient and try to find a formula to resolve this nuclear issue. We are determined to remove any ambiguities over our nuclear ambitions and also protect our right.

Our advice to the agency is to review Iran’s case tomorrow logically and realistically to avoid making the case more complicated,

He can also contribute with an article. If he wants to defend the Holocaust [the fact that it happened] in that article, he can do so. We will give him the time to read out...

We will discuss the issue and the rumors surrounding it with the agency. It is not very sensitive or ambiguous.

The Europeans interpreted and violated the Paris Agreement unilaterally.

Nuclear research will continue. Suspension of (nuclear activities including uranium enrichment) is not in our agenda. This issue is irreversible.

We do not humble ourselves in the poisoned atmosphere created by foreign sources.

were carried out without regard to world public opinion and particularly the Islamic countries.

The Europeans should get used to hearing other opinions, even if they don’t like them.

The evacuation of the Zionist settlements shows the victory of the Palestinians legitimate resistance, and the Islamic republic of Iran welcomes any withdrawal from Palestinian land,

Iran has summoned its ambassador in Denmark to Tehran. Freedoms should be accompanied by responsibility.

Iran is skeptical about good faith in the US overture to hold direct talks with Iran because it is not compatible with Washington’s hostile behavior toward Iran.

If Europeans respect our right, we are optimistic about Iran-Europe talks. Important talks could be held and important results could be gained.

Since the very beginning we have insisted upon our rights. The people call for the same thing and will continue the path.

We need to continue talks about the Russian plan.

So, there is no reason for exerting pressure on Iran.

This time they asked to visit other areas of the site. They talked with our friends this time. What they have done in Iran has been in the framework of the NPT (Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty).

The NPT is an international commitment and we are committed to that.

redundant and has no legal value.

We don’t believe that threats and pressure, including using the UN Security Council, will make Iran relinquish its legitimate rights [to peaceful nuclear energy]. Nuclear research activities are continuing.

within one and a half months.

Iran has no problem with resuming negotiations, but the Islamic Republic of Iran doesn’t accept pressure and conditional talks.

The Russian plan is still on the table but the ground for its implementation should be prepared. Russia’s plan and other plans that will preserve our rights can be assessed.

Enrichment is not on the agenda for the time being, but if the IAEA meeting on Monday leads to radical results, we will make our decision to correspond to that,

The doors for negotiation are open and we can still find a formula to reach a conclusion.

It would be worrying if it was concealed, but we are doing it transparently and under cameras.

Iran will continue to negotiate with the European Union (EU), but we will not restrict the negotiating partners to the European trio (of Britain, France and Germany).

Iran won’t give up its rights and has prepared plans for any eventuality.

Iran does not want to substitute them as negotiating partners.

The European’s submitted proposals regarding the nuclear case is not acceptable for Iran,

We have not received any particular plan yet. Its quite clear that Iran will positively look at any proposal that recognize right of having nuclear enrichment on its soil.

The evacuation of the Zionist regime from the Gaza Strip shows the reality that what was taken by force would not have been retrieved without resistance.

The proposal has to conform itself with the new circumstances.

As the UN secretary-general has emphasized accuracy of legal and technical aspects of the report, we hope that the final report would be more documented and free from political consideration,

We believe that the US involvement in the negotiations would just make things more complicated.

The activities are our inalienable right and no one can make such a request.

They are doing everything to avoid referral to the council. Iran is not strong enough to withstand sanctions,

Iran is ready to resume the research activities after the inspectors remove the seals. It is our right as (much as) other members of the Nonproliferation Treaty. Iran should not be exempted.