I think Bush should know that our options are more numerous than the U.S. options. If the United States makes such a big mistake, then Iran will definitely have more choices to defend itself.

Sanctions will not come out of today’s session but their expectations from Iran may be announced after the meeting.

We hope that Monday’s IAEA meeting will be positive and helpful to the future negotiations. However, if it turns to the other side, we will make decisions accordingly.

For half a century, the defenders of the Holocaust have used every tribune to defend their position, and now have to listen to others.

This resolution is politically motivated and has been approved under the pressures of the United States and its allies and is void of any legal or rational basis, and (therefore it) is unacceptable.

The wrong policies of the United States in Iraq never helped restore peace and stability in that country and instead caused an escalation of tension and crisis there.

We deeply regret the news of the sinking of the ferry which was carrying Egyptian Hajj pilgrims and workers in the Red Sea and the death and disappearance of several people on board.

There is no need for concern, and according to information we obtained from the Azerbaijani side, it is not targeted at Iran.

Iran will never abandon its nuclear fuel cycle.

It is a strange world It is possible to discuss everything but the Holocaust.

The European proposals are unacceptable.

Syria is one of our friends. The actions that are taking place against this country, headed by Israel, is an injustice.

It is not compatible with international law and criteria to embargo spare parts of passenger planes which directly concern human lives.

It is hoped that this court’s serving of justice will heal the pain of those who were affected and of the families of the victims of Saddam’s homicide.

Referring Iran to any place but the IAEA won’t solve any problems.

Iran has no problem with Turkey joining the EU. We will be happy for them. The Turkish nation wants it and therefore we welcome it.

If they (the U.S. and its European allies) think referring Iran to the U.N. Security Council makes Iran to give up its rights, they have made a big mistake.

Unlike the British we are not going to express our views without the necessary investigations.

We have not demanded anything excessive. The European side should not make an excessive demand either.

Israel was misleading public opinion of the international community by magnifying Iranian nuclear program to allay international concerns about its systematic genocide of the Palestinians.

We welcome the start of Saddam’s trial, … a person who has committed crimes against humanity over a long period.

The French president uncovered the covert intentions of nuclear powers in using this lever (nuclear weapons) to determine political games.

We are not afraid of the Security Council. What is important for us is defending our legitimate rights. Iran is a powerful country and is able to defend its interests.

This is not acceptable at all.

If the report contains expert assessment, there will be nothing left to worry about.

It is not on his agenda.

We regard the European proposals as an initial and not the final proposal.

The comprehensive initiative will lead to a breakthrough in the currently stranded nuclear negotiations with Europe, if the Europeans refrain from any precondition they have set on the negotiations.

If Iran’s help is needed and requested we’d respond to the call, however we should make sure first that there is such a request,

Conditions have changed, we are facing a new situation.

Iran has no problem with resuming talks. But it will not accept conditional talks under pressure.

We will only review those proposals which include mastering the nuclear fuel cycle inside Iran.

We welcome the trial of Saddam, but the invasion of Iran should be included in the charges,

The source of contamination was not related to Iran. We are sure the source is not internal.

The referral of nuclear file to the Security Council is not scary at all for Iran, and it does not have any legal basis.

The Zionists and their allies played unskillfully this time, making it clear that their allegations against Iran’s nuclear programs emanate from Iran’s objection to Israel’s systematic killing of defenseless Palestinians.

If the Russian proposal makes itself compatible with the new conditions, it can be negotiated.

Gone is the time when they could deny Iran its rights by threatening it, … legitimate right to have peaceful nuclear technology.

Our red line is our nuclear rights.

Europe’s behavior will heavily influence the decision.

Indefinite suspension of nuclear enrichment activities is not acceptable to the Islamic Republic of Iran … and it is not a subject of the talks.

Europeans should be patient and try to find a formula to resolve this nuclear issue. We are determined to remove any ambiguities over our nuclear ambitions and also protect our right.

Our advice to the agency is to review Iran’s case tomorrow logically and realistically to avoid making the case more complicated,

He can also contribute with an article. If he wants to defend the Holocaust [the fact that it happened] in that article, he can do so. We will give him the time to read out...

We will discuss the issue and the rumors surrounding it with the agency. It is not very sensitive or ambiguous.

The Europeans interpreted and violated the Paris Agreement unilaterally.

Nuclear research will continue. Suspension of (nuclear activities including uranium enrichment) is not in our agenda. This issue is irreversible.

We do not humble ourselves in the poisoned atmosphere created by foreign sources.

were carried out without regard to world public opinion and particularly the Islamic countries.

The Europeans should get used to hearing other opinions, even if they don’t like them.