The second round of talks will go ahead, but the Russian proposal must be adapted to the new situation so that we can examine it.

Such a statement being made by Italian foreign minister is an example of indifference to the massacre of defenseless Palestinians by Israel and its state terrorism,

Sanctions were not without effect. The United States is using its technology as a political instrument. This is unacceptable.

What happened was a natural reaction. Rice and Danish officials should apologize. Such comments could worsen the situation and an apology could alleviate the tension.

We haven’t received any written and definite proposal from Russia yet.

The motive behind such dirty moves is to sow discord, target Islamic and national unity and solidarity in Iraq.

Such reports aim to exert pressure on Islamic Republic of Iran, but Iran will continue its work to achieve peaceful technology in the framework of its national interests and rights, without being influenced by such...

The judiciary must finish the preliminary enquiries and if needed they will be put on trial, it depends on the judges’ opinion.

We are still committed to the NPT. We have always been committed to this international agreement, but we cannot accept it being used for political ends.

If the Europeans cannot live up to their commitments, we will negotiate with other countries as is our right.

This is a psychological war launched by Americans because they feel angry and desperate regarding Iran?s nuclear dossier.

The door for negotiations is still open.

The current issue should be resolved through negotiations and the existing regulations.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry has decided to hold a conference on the Holocaust to assess its scale by scientific means and discuss its consequences.

Enrichment should be carried out on Iranian soil, as other Iranian officials have already said,

The conference to discuss the Holocaust will be held in Tehran this spring.

The conditions have changed now, the Russian proposal is not on the agenda. The Islamic republic will not give up its rights.

First, they should not insist (on the terms of the resolution). Second, they should correct it. If the other parties’ reaction is not along these lines, the Islamic Republic of Iran will take these measures.

Iran?s uranium enrichment and nuclear research and development activities are irreversible.

As far as I know there is no such proposal (on enrichment).

We hope the agency will act with diligence understand the situation.

Better results will definitely be achieved by resorting to negotiations and using respectful language rather than using the language of threats and intimidation.

We still believe negotiations should restore and guarantee Iran’s rights to have access to peaceful nuclear technology.

(The authorities) have told the Iranian people not to attack diplomatic territory. Nevertheless, Western countries should atone for their mistake.

We support Syria without any doubt. Syria is our friend.

What the president said is an academic issue. The West’s reaction shows their continued support for Zionists.

We are ready for negotiations, but it is up to the Europeans how logically they respond. It would benefit the Europeans to be logical about this matter.

If it means enrichment be carried out (only) in Russia, we have said it is not acceptable. But if it is a complementary plan, we will study it.

Dialogue is the only solution. Europeans should not act in haste. They should note that agreement comes out of talks.

We will accept positively the propositions and the plans that recognize the right of the Islamic republic to carry out enrichment on its own soil.

They (Kuwaitis) will naturally not be allowed to do anything in Iran’s territorial waters, but if they do anything, it should be where it is not claimed by Iran.

Considering arrest and abduction of certain Iranian pilgrims Iranians are needed to visit the country through legal channels.

This resolution is political. It comes from American pressure. … It lacks any legal or logical basis and is unacceptable.

The 5+1 meeting in Moscow is more important for the participating countries than for us, because if they do not act wisely and make a mistake, they are the ones who will suffer losses. The...

The agency and other parties should not block roads to … Iran.

Whatever the result of this meeting might be, Iran will not abandon its rights (to nuclear technology).

We advise them (Europe) not to choose any path except dialogue. If there is a retribution to be paid, that will include Europe too.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has full control over its long, joint borders with Afghanistan. The recent U.S. accusations against Iran are inspired and dictated by the Zionist regime.

The only way to reach an understanding and to get out of the current situation is talks.

The Russian proposal is not on the agenda any more. Circumstances have changed. We must wait and see how the situation will develop [in the UN Security Council].

There is no judicial or legal reason to send the Iranian dossier to the Security Council.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has adopted measures to fight such moves in line with efforts to defend national security and within the framework of bilateral accords already reached with Iraq.

Nuclear research will go on, and threats and blackmail will have no effect on the regime’s decision.

It would be good for Mr Blair to participate in the Holocaust seminar in Tehran.

Let the negotiations with different sides continue. Later we can make judgments.

However, that does not mean that we will rule out the European trio. We just want to talk with all countries and our principal negotiating partner is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Instead of being misleading, the Danish prime minister should present an apology and put an end to this affair, and promise it will never happen again.

Unlike the British, Iran does not make accusations without sufficient evidence to support them.

Tomorrow will be crucial for the IAEA, for a big test is confronting the agency, by which it will show how it defends its own authority and credibility by securing its members’ rights. We hope...

Meanwhile, we are looking forward to the reaction of other states to the grave mistake made in the IAEA.