They [Kuwaitis] will naturally not be allowed to do anything in Iran’s territorial waters, but if they do anything, it should be where it is not claimed by Iran.

It is aimed at violating the religious values, causing discord and sectarian wars as well as damaging national unity in Iraq.

We have information that the United States is interfering in the northwest of Iran. That is unacceptable and we are going to protest,

I recommend that they do not make hasty decisions, be prudent and study their path in the past. Any time they have pressured Iran they have got adverse results.

These remarks are made to justify failures in Iraq, since Americans and world opinions are pinpointing (that US) weaknesses are on the rise,

We will stand by our right to nuclear technology. It is our red line. We are ready to deal with any possible scenario. Iran is not afraid of threatening language.

We will defend our rights. Iran believes that we can come to a solution through talks, and there is no legal basis for referring Iran’s dossier to the Security Council. We are not afraid at...

Insulting the prophet was unacceptable, resentful, and a sign of barbarism.

Iran is determined to remove ambiguities, continue talks and win its rights.

Dissemination of such reports aim to cover up failure of the occupying forces in guaranteeing security of Iraq.

Britain, instead of repeating awkward accusations, had better think of a plan to withdraw its troops from Iraq.

Iran will not allow any cross-border operation of any terrorist group against Iranian or Iraqi interests consistent with their commitment to the international campaign against terrorism.

We have not moved or transferred our hard currency assets. The report on the move is not correct.

We will reconsider our economic cooperation with those countries that voted against us.

It is a strange world. It is possible to discuss everything except the Holocaust. The Foreign Ministry plans to hold a conference on the scientific aspect of the issue to discuss and review its repercussions.

It seems that the European proposal will be an empty one and will not satisfy Iran’s demands.

We will decide depending on the position they have towards the Islamic republic.

We welcome the start of the trial of Saddam, who has committed crimes against humanity,

Iran’s preference is to defend its national rights enshrined in the NPT.

Operating some centrifuges is different from the enrichment, and we will continue the research work and never give in under pressures.

America and Rice are pressuring other countries to vote against Iran, but we hope those countries act independently.

The statements of certain western officials show that contrary to their absurd claims, westerners are disqualified, and impetuous, lacking any cultural background.

We are not worried by the Security Council, but it is the wrong method.

The Russian plan should be taken as a complimenting enrichment inside the country (Iran).

We are discussing the legal, scientific, financial and joint investment aspects of the Russian proposal.

The American leaders are under pressure from the international and regional public and the Iraqi Muslim people and to justify their failings they invent a ficticious enemy.

If they do not act wisely and make a mistake, they are the ones who will suffer losses.

The door for negotiations is still open. We don’t fear the Security Council. It’s not the end of the world.

Preliminary conditions need to be set first and this has not been done yet. Iran is in no rush for these conditions to be set because we were from the beginning pessimistic about U.S. needs.

We are determined not to give up our rights to nuclear energy, and suspension of relevant activities is not on our agenda. The issue is irreversible.

We haven’t started enrichment yet but everything depends on the result of tomorrow’s meeting.

Iran has in talks over the past two years proved its goodwill but Europeans failed to be logical enough; and now we are witnessing their declaration of interest in continuing talks.

The West must not make the mistake that we are seeking to bargain. We have certain rights and the Westerners must accept those.

Trust could only be sustained based on the implementation of international regulations and not on self-serving interpretation. The latter could create international anarchy.

Such measures run counter to human and Islamic principles and values,

There is no crisis in this country that requires us to set up a crisis headquarters. Iran is currently in a good situation.

condolences and sympathy with the Iraqi people and the government.

It is a strange world ‘¦ It is possible to discuss everything but the Holocaust.

The Islamic Republic of Iran will not accept any negotiations with preconditions attached.

We will do our utmost to guarantee their release and safe return to Iran.

I have nothing to say about this.

Given the existing evidence of the American forces’ involvement in this criminal act, we want the international community and human rights organizations to look into the issue.

Unfortunately, what happened in Vienna proved the prediction that the meeting would be totally political.

The situation has changed. Still, we will attend talks with Russia on February 16.

The victims have complained about the lack of timely assistance and we are prepared to send our contributions to the people through the Red Crescent.

It is clear in advance that the result of a meeting that takes place under the pressure of certain countries will be political.

It (the IAEA meeting) is unnecessary under the current circumstances, and it has been staged politically under pressures of certain countries.

We will continue our research and will not suspend it. We will not give up our right.

The package is against the spirit of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and against the provisions of the Paris agreement.

The meeting is more important for the participating countries than us (Iran) because they will be the ones that will suffer if they do not act wisely and make a mistake again.