For him to be associated with this movie is cause for concern. He needs to come clean that he repudiates Holocaust denial, and that he understands the Holocaust was not just another atrocity that occurred...

For (Gibson) to be associated with this movie is cause for concern. He needs to come clean that he repudiates Holocaust denial.

Foster is wrong. There’s nothing morally complex about what Riefenstahl did as Hitler’s favorite filmmaker. The only thing complex is Foster’s confusion on this issue.

Holocaust-deniers are not scholars or researchers — they are bigots who try to hide their anti-semitism behind the mask of fake scholarship. For a U.S. government report to call them ‘scholars’ gives them the legitimacy...

It is an act of historic justice that the U.S. government, which in 1941 interfered with Bingham’s rescue activity, is now publicly recognizing that Bingham was right, and, in effect, acknowledging that the Roosevelt administration...

[The Wyman Institute is urging the three entertainers to publicly retract their] inaccurate and hurtful … Such analogies pollute public discourse, by trivializing the brutal horrors committed by the Nazis. Hitler was a maniacal dictator...

A U.S. government publication should not treat Holocaust-deniers as if they are a legitimate part of scholarly discussions about the Holocaust. One glance at the web site of the Institute for Historical Review reveals its...

Some entertainers simply don’t know much about history. The fact is that there were no Jews in Hitler’s hierarchy, the policies of America and Israel are not similar to those of Hitler, and African-American conservatives...

Here they had significant detailed confirmation of mass murder and, yet, still their response was to come up with ways to create the impression of concern but no intention of taking any meaningful action, …...

Hitler and his regime murdered six million Jews and launched a world war that caused more than 40 million deaths. How can that be compared to current U.S. government policy?