Most cities are very responsible in doing that.

These are the steps we feel, strongly, need to be taken if what we’re facing is a new paradigm in hurricane activity.

We don’t get involved in that.

It’s a little bit higher than usual.

To continue on a track to increase the number of plants we have that are gas perhaps is not the wave of the future.

We’re very confident of our records. At the same time, it is dynamic and it’s changing.

I don’t think there’s any conflict at all between what the hurricane center was saying and what we’re saying.

I understand that this has been very frustrating to the officials at the city, but we’re just waiting to make sure that we have everything completed. If indeed there is a difference, we will resolve...

We’re going to take into consideration the inspection cycles, but keep in mind poles don’t deteriorate overnight.

We can understand their frustration. Certainly this kind of reconciliation takes time. But in the end, you will be reconciled. You will be made whole.

A law like this may have unintended consequences.

If there are more intense storms in these hurricane cycles, well, essentially we need a reserve that is going to be able to take care of one or two or three storms.

We fully support an 8-year cycle as well. If the commission feels an 8-year cycle will provide that additional confidence regarding the resistance of our system we support that objective.

It is a significant hardening of the infrastructure. It is a recognition that – from everything the experts are saying – that the forecasts are for more intense storm seasons, (which) has made us rethink...

So we will be adding that to our billing records.

What we do is that if they believe there’s an issue, we have to take this information and reconcile it. We go out there and do a complete streetlight count. If we owe the city,...