And in fact you told us you didn’t have the impression at all that Mr. Weaver wanted to keep Huang’s receipt of these sporadic faxes a secret in any way. Is that true?

This is not a case about religion or Islam or a cultural clash. It’s about people who have been sued for having asked legitimate questions.

And indeed that you never had the impression there was never anything unusual or secretive about this? Correct.

I take it Mr. Weaver was a registered lobbyist at this time. Was that correct?

This is really an attempt, and not an unsuccessful attempt, to terrify people.

I take it you told the staff that from what you could observe all that Mr. Weaver wanted to avoid was any improper and incorrect appearance that he was lobbying Mr. Huang. Is that true?