He’s going to be the first defense witness.

You have to do what’s in your client’s best interest and no one else’s.

How could you make that up? You can’t.

You’ve got to come and listen to the show.

I think it was because it was six o’clock at night … I will be asking the judge to reconsider it considering the lateness of the night and we’ll see.

I think we can say this is an absolutely wonderful thing that the jury takes their job and responsibility as seriously as the lawyers and police did in this case.

We believe this is just a wild guess that came from the emotion of the moment. The doctor treated this baby and felt very sad and he spoke from emotion as opposed to cold, calculated...

He’s not some cold-hearted killer who went to the hospital out of a show. He was extremely upset and distraught to the point of severe depression that evening.

This would have given the jury something to compromise on if they felt there was not enough evidence for murder, yet three kids are dead and someone has to pay.

In order to prove whether it was voluntary or involuntary, you must have access to Ms. Hamm or a psychologist who can talk to Ms. Hamm. When we filed the motion, we believed that would...

It’s an adjustment in the market. Closing activity lags sales activity.

It gives the jury something to compromise on if they feel that there is not enough evidence for murder and yet three kids are dead, so somebody ought to pay. You always, as a lawyer,...

If they sit down and ask themselves what evidence they have that he meant to kill the children, it won’t take them very long.

But that’s not going to happen. I’m confident that’s not going to happen.

I can’t imagine you could convict someone of murder on the basis of a person like that.

This case is an accident. It is not an intentional act.

If that’s the only evidence you’ve got, it’s a sad day in the justice system to prosecute people for murder on the basis of that.

This is an attempt to get discovery they are not entitled to – it’s also six months too late.

If we take it according to the way the evidence was presented, that was about the twelfth of 78 witnesses, so obviously there is a long deliberation process going … The jury is taking their...

He is calm. He knows he’s going to testify and he’s going to explain what happened, and he’s ready to do it.

The lay person doesn’t have that training so their response to a life-threatening situation isn’t always the same or as heroic as you would like it to be.

I would be shocked if we had a verdict before the first of April.

I believe Amanda would have testified exactly like she told the police seven times — this was an accident and how it happened. So I wasn’t concerned about that.

This jury was left with no choice.

He is very calm and comfortable.

A lot of people have said in this case ‘I can’t believe that he didn’t go in and try to save those kids, it’s just 4 feet of water.’ Well, he did and he knew...

This is another effort by the prosecution to keep out evidence the jury ought to hear.

If you’ve ever been to a funeral where there’s a parent who has lost a child and they’re dealing with lots of people, oftentimes they will smile as a way of getting through it. It...

I think this jury was left with no choice. They were put in a position of finding him guilty of murder or letting him go home.

We’re in a position where one of these two statements is a lie. He’s admitted he’s lied about the most important part of his testimony so how can the judge allow this person to testify?...

I can’t say it entered into any of my decision making.

The outcome itself shows it was an unreasonable risk.