It would appear as though we just basically wanted this agreement so badly we got it – badly.

A lot of people are fraudulent, making it sound like a science. It’s not.

I’m not optimistic we can somehow diplomatically get them to give them up.

It reduces regret to nearly zero.

I think it’s sort of smoke and mirrors.

are worse than Iran having a bomb.

The biggest loser is Iran because there has finally been a finding that they are in non-compliance and that changes the equation enormously…They are now considered violators and no longer a member of the club.

We’ve already begun to talk about regime change in North Korea. It is the clearest way for us to come to the assistance of people who are being repressed and it is the only way...

The way it’s being interpreted today, where everyone has a right to get within several days of having an arsenal force of weapons-usable material, turns the treaty on its head.

If New Delhi decides to vote against the resolution that would definitely put obstacles at least in the nuclear deal signed in July 2005.

Until and unless the US-Allied stakes in the strait’s threatened closure can be reduced, Iran will literally think and act as if it has us over a barrel.

If the idea is to promote a sense of security at the same time that the development of large reactors to a long list of countries is promoted, then it’s very misguided. They’re trying to...