That pervades CALEA and everything we talk about. This is something that Congress has been very derelict in addressing.

Camera phones threaten to turn everyone into amateur paparazzi. We are witnessing our personal space shrink because of the way technology is being used.

But our society is founded on the fact that we don’t want to give the government this broad-based power.

Sure, the more intrusive the government becomes, the more potential crime it can solve.

They have yet to answer: Why didn’t you go to FISA court? It could be that the administration thought it couldn’t meet some of the FISA standards.

In a big city, it’s increasingly hard to go throughout the day without being captured on many surveillance cameras.

A lot can be learned about a person through the combination of massive amounts of data and the use of sophisticated analytical techniques.

Most companies are keeping all employee files online now.

We have to ask ourselves anew the larger question: What surveillance power should the government have? And to what extent should the government be allowed to manage the development of technology to embody its surveillance...

A cola company might safeguard its secret cola recipe with all its might, and it will do nothing to keep its own employees’ identities safe.

It’s easy to tell who the folks are that don’t believe in evolution. They’re the ones who have refused to participate in it.

The approach we take to identity theft is to put the burden on consumers to take steps to prevent it.

Having your identity stolen is somewhat like contracting a chronic, protracted disease.

Even though its anonymous, it’s still ominous,