Today’s decision means everyone loses. The Times has lost this case and will now undertake the difficult and sad process of removing significant portions from its electronic historical archive.

She’d given her pledge of confidentiality. She was prepared to honor that. We were going to support her.

I felt strongly that, one, Judy deserved the support of the paper in this cause – and the editorial page is the right place for such support, not the news pages. And secondly, that this...

Maybe a deal was possible earlier. And maybe, in retrospect, looking back, you could say this was a moment you could have jumped on. If so, shame on us. I tend to think not.

The decision to hold [the story] never even got to me. It was made for good journalistic reasons.

We are trying to make a product, a news experience, that more fully engages our readers, that allows them to want to spend more time with us.

It’s not a Community Unity Day unless everyone is represented. We should all be there together.

We are grateful to Judy for her significant personal sacrifice to defend an important journalistic principle. I respect her decision to retire from The Times and wish her well.

We have it kind of down to a science now. But we enjoy doing it. It’s so much fun.

This is a very serious crime. Once the hackers are identified, we will prosecute them to the full extent of the law.

This car had her hand on the wheel because she was the one at risk.

Journalists should not have to face the prospect of imprisonment for doing nothing more than aggressively seeking to report on the government’s actions.